21. Ott MA ainsi que al., The newest trading-from between hormonal contraceptives and you may condoms certainly adolescents, Point of views towards the Sexual and you may Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
twenty-two. Wilson EK and Koo Horsepower, Relationships between reduced-money ladies relationships functions as well as their contraceptive explore, Views towards Sexual and you will Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Loved ones and you will buddy intimacy in order to adolescent sexual couples in relationship to condom fool around with, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA et al., This new developmental relationship out of matchmaking top quality, hormonal birth control choices and you will condom low-fool around with certainly one of teenage women, Record of Teenage Fitness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
25. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational commitment and risks so you can relationships repairs goals: impacts on the condom fool around with, Journal out-of American School Health, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty-seven. Manning WD mais aussi al., Younger mature dating relationship and also the management of sexual risk, People Browse and you will Coverage Remark, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty eight. Manlove J et al., Adolescent mothers within the foster proper care: chance things and you will outcomes for childhood in addition to their students, Browse Brief, Arizona, DC: Child Fashion, 2011.
31. DiClemente RJ et al., Sexual risk behavior from the that have earlier sex people: a study of black teenage lady, Sexually Sent Disease 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty two. Fortenberry JD et al., Condom have fun with because a function of time in the fresh and you will centered adolescent sexual matchmaking, Western Log regarding Social Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you may Franzetta K, Exposure and you can defensive situations for the changeover to help you a primary sexual experience of an older companion, Journal away from Adolescent Fitness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Contraception have fun with habits round the teens’ sexual relationship, report exhibited within yearly fulfilling of your own Inhabitants Organization off The usa, Philadelphia, .
35. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop and you may Longmore MA, Connecting: the connection contexts away from “nonrelationship” sex, Diary out of egyptian hot women Adolescent Research, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
thirty-six. Carlson MJ and you will Furstenberg FF, Jr, The effects out-of multiple-partnered fertility to have adult info and you will relationship, papers shown in the yearly conference of your Organization to have Personal Coverage Data and you can Government, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and Graefe DR, Wanting a friend? The new relationship and you will cohabitation histories regarding unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., From Wedlock: Explanations and you will Outcomes of Nonmarital Virility, Ny: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Emerging Answers 2007: Lookup Conclusions into Software to reduce Teenager Pregnancy and Sexually Carried Ailment, Washington, DC: Federal Strategy to prevent Adolescent and you may Unexpected Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The new perception out of applications to improve contraception fool around with certainly mature feminine: a look at experimental and you will quasi-experimental knowledge, Views into the Sexual and Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Affiliations
Jennifer Manlove try program city movie director and you can elder search researcher, Kate Welti was research scientist, E Wildsmith try elder research scientist and you will Megan Barry is look analyst, the at Youngster Styles, Bethesda, MD.
Records
In the 1st research, which used a location-urban area decide to try of teens from inside the Kansas, Manning and you will acquaintances 9 categorized dating services toward that directory away from self-confident qualities (such personal mind-revelation, intimate love and you may relationships salience) plus one list away from negative characteristics (for example conflict and you can nonexclusivity). They unearthed that large score with the sometimes list was basically for the less condom feel. Detailed analyses plus ideal one to a mix of high self-confident and high negative results try for the smaller condom texture.
In each bullet, professionals was basically requested “Just like the time out of history interview, are you presently within the an online dating relationship the place you think from on your own as an element of two?” I considered participants to be in a matchmaking relationship once they responded yes whenever this new partner try a recent relationship partner, in lieu of a partner, cohabiting mate otherwise previous companion. Same-sex matchmaking matchmaking and the ones the spot where the respondent got prior to now cohabited towards the mate were excluded. Full, 4,013 respondents claimed a current relationship matchmaking through the 2002–2005. Of one’s left respondents, 553 weren’t about shot in cycles interesting, step one,876 were cohabiting otherwise married, and dos,542 didn’t come with current dating relationships. Respondents within decide to try was basically aged 18–twenty six.
Relationship partnership are predicated on two strategies. The initial try an excellent 0–10 level where participants ranked the alternative that they and you will the mate was to one another within the 6 months. A rating of no indicated not a chance; good 10 conveyed 100% possibilities. We categorized so it chances once the lower (less than six), medium (6–9) or large (10). On the 2nd measure of connection, i integrated a variable for whether the couple got talked about marriage otherwise cohabitation; answers was classified while the discussed none, discussed cohabitation otherwise discussed relationship. (Participants whom stated having chatted about each other cohabitation and wedding was indeed incorporated regarding the marriage category.)
Heterogeneous birth-control effects contained in this long run relationships may also be helpful establish straight down birth control consistency inside offered adolescent relationship, despite higher likelihood of ever-use of contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Past research has translated it trying to find by the positing that couples are prepared to sporadically forgo birth prevention use in more serious relationship; thirty-two, 34 yet not, the performance suggest that less birth-control explore can be focused when you look at the long-emergency room identity relationship characterized by higher conflict and lower commitment.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Fl and you will Pleck JH, This new figure from young men’s room condom have fun with throughout the and you can across dating, Family relations Believe Perspectives, 1994, 26(6):246–251.